Monday, May 25, 2009

Cheer An Dance Noisemakers

falsehood the man on the moon and we live in 1989

I can not believe how much there People who think the moon landing was real. And it was all a farce, because the Yankees somehow had to show more than the Russians, and what a coincidence, just was in the Cold War era. Among other outstanding things that indicate the falseness of the man on the moon, I think it was fraud because it sgte:

First: The flag is waving, on the moon there is no gravity, so no would have to fly. Okay that is a kind of rod at the top, which keeps it straight, but still would have to be straight, not waving. The NASA officials said it was because the flag had been folded and folded during the trip and therefore, what you see are wrinkles, not the flag waving. But I will say that they are wrinkles? Please ... Those are not wrinkles, you realize that what is a flag flying and what a wrinkle. Is perfectly still visible waves as he flies a flag as what they say they are wrinkles?

Second: The ship has a nozzle below, which propels it, and therefore, would form a crater below and sweep across the lunar dust, and yet everything is intact or not nothing had happened and there is no crater or anything like that and there are traces of the footprint of an astronaut underneath the module. How? "He stepped before they landed? No way ...

Third: You can not get now in 2009 with all the technology out there, that fart that can put a satellite into orbit, what I will say that they will get in '69? Please ... Moreover, since the last time that the man allegedly walked on the moon (1972) 17 years have passed, and why were not more out since then? There must be some. Or if the technology was available only for the time?

Fourth: The Russians were more advanced than the Yankees did not, what the Yankees are going to come, which were lower in this regard? If true, whether it would be somewhat likely, the Russians had not hesitated to go, and yet did not?

This was absolutely unreal. The craft took off, yes, but what does that matter? After falling into the sea. There are counter arguments by the NASA, which ensures that everything was true, but what does that matter? Or a case for NASA to have counter arguments to say that was true? Absolutely not. Because it is against argued, need not be true, because they always lie to you will be well provided. They will not say that this was so and so.

Do not want I believe that anyone can fake anything? Then you try to you ignorant ... Because no one knows them as fuck you want. But that does not mean you have no right, because I do not think you need to know much or be an astronaut or something like that to realize it was all a lie.

course, as they do not know, I come like a glove. So you have to see if it was something really true or, as many say, one of many Hollywood productions. If this was filmed mainly in a desert.

Writer: Federico
Seen

0 comments:

Post a Comment